REGRESSION MODELS OF INDIVIDUAL LINEAR SIZES OF MOLARS DEPENDING ON THE FEATURES OF CEPHALOMETRIC INDICES IN PRACTICALLY HEALTHY MEN OF THE WESTERN AND EASTERN REGIONS OF UKRAINE


  • О.О. Kotsyura National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine
Keywords: regression analysis, dimensions of molars, computed-tomography, cephalometry, practically healthy men, Western and Eastern regions of Ukraine

Abstract

Restoration of missing teeth should be done as close as possible to the natural anatomical features of the person's tooth-jaw apparatus. That is why the problem of aesthetics in dentistry has ceased to be only orthopedic and has shifted towards a constitutional and ethnic odontology. The purpose of the study is to construct and carry out analyzes obtained by regression analysis, models of computed-tomographic size of molars, depending on the features of cephalometric indices of practically healthy men of the Western and Eastern regions of Ukraine. A computed-tomographic study of molars with the following odontometry and cephalometry of 36 practically healthy men of the Western region of Ukraine – residents of Volyn, Rivne, Lviv, Chernivtsi, Ternopil, Khmelnytskyi, Transcarpathian and Ivano-Frankivsk regions and 35 men of the Eastern region of Ukraine - residents of Kharkiv, Donetsk and Luhansk regions was performed with the help of the Dental Cone-ray Tomography Veraviewepocs-3D (Morita, Japan). Regression models of linear sizes of molars, depending on cephalometric indices, were conducted using the statistical software package Statistica 6.1. As a result of the conducted research, reliable models of computed-tomographic size of the upper and lower jaws molars were constructed in practically healthy men of the Western [7 models of mesio-distal dimensions (R2 = 0.532-0.646), most of which include sagittal arc (12.5%), outer-eye width, nose depth, distance between nasion and inter-cutter point, body length of the lower jaw on the left, largest head circumference and maximum head length (by 7.5%); 6 models of vestibular-tongue dimensions (R2 = 0.527-0.646), which most often include nasal depth (20.0%), body length of the lower jaw to the left (16.0%), physiological face length and morphological face length (by 12.0%); 1 model of crown height (R2 = 0.579)] as well as Eastern [3 models of crown height (R2 = 0.538-0.682), which most often include nose depth (15.0%), face type, physiological face length, morphological face length, smallest width head and sagittal arc (by 10.0%); 2 models of mesio-distal sizes (R2 = 0.572 and 0.556), which most often include inter eye fossa width (15.4%)] regions of Ukraine. Thus, in practically healthy men from the Western and Eastern administrative-territorial regions of Ukraine, based on the specifics of cephalometric indicators and face type, reliable regression models (with determination coefficient R2 greater than 0.5) of computed-tomographic size of molars of the upper and lower jaws (out of 40 possible 14 for the western and 5 for the eastern regions of Ukraine).

References

[1] Alekseev, V. P., & Debets, G. F. (1964). Craniometry: anthropological research methodology. М.: Science.

[2] Allen, D., Rebellato, J., Sheats, R., Ceron, A. M. (2003). Skeletal and Dental Contributions to Posterior Cross-bites. Angle Orthodontist., 5, 515-524. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0515:SADCTP>2.0.CO;2

[3] Anari, S. (2017). Aesthetic dentistry Changing public perceptions. British dental journal, 223(6), 390. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.791

[4] Аnderson, G., Fields, H. W., Beck, M., Chacon, G., Vig, K. W. (2006). Development of Cephalometric Norms Using a Unified Facial and Dental Approach. The Angle Orthodontist, 76(4), 612-618. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0612:DOCNUA]2.0.CO;2

[5] Bamber, M. A., Harris, M., Natcher, C. (2001). A validation of two orthognathic model surgery techniques. J. Orthod., 28, 135-142. doi: 10.1093/ortho/28.2.135

[6] Bedoya, A., Osorio, J. C., Tamayo, J. A. (2015). Dental Arch Size, Biting Force, Bizygomatic Width and Face Height in Three Colombian Ethnic Groups. International Journal of Morphology, 33(1), 55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000100009

[7] Bennet, M. E., & Tulloch, J. F. C. (1999). Understanding orthodontic treatment satisfaction from the patient's perspective: a qualitative approach. Clinical Orthod. and Research., 2(2), 53-61. PMID: 10534980

[8] Chernyak, V. V., Gasyuk, Р. А., & Nikiforov, А. G. (2013). Method of determination of individual odontoglyphic status. Bukovinsky Medical Bulletin, 3, 181-182.

[9] Cracel-Nogueira, F., & Pinho, T. (2013). Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners. Int. Orthod., 11(4), 432-444. PMID: 24427802

[10] Flis, P. S., Omelchuk, N. А., & Rashchenko, N. В. (2008). Orthodontics. Kiev: Medicine. ISBN 978-966-10-0026-0

[11] Gayvoronskiy, I. V., Gayvoronskiy, A. I., Gayvoronskaya, M. G., Dubovik, E. I., Kevorkova, S. A., Koltunov, A. V., … Schanikova, A. S. (2008). Craniometric correlations of the dentoalveolar system, temporomandibular joint and facial skull in an adult. Morphology, 133(2), 29.

[12] Glushak, A. A. (2015). Vestibular-or al size of teeth in boys and girls with orthognathic bite depending on the shape of head and type of face. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University, 19(1), 37-43.

[13] Hieu, L. C., Zlatov, N., Vander Sloten, J., Bohez, E., Khanh, L., Binh, P. H., … Toshev, Y. (2005). Medical rapid prototyping applications and methods. Assembly Automation, 25(4), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150510626415

[14] Mavili, M. E., Canter, H. I., Saglam-Aydinatay, B., Kamaci, S., & Kocadereli, I. (2007). Use of three-dimensional medical modeling methods for precise planning of orthognathic surgery. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 18(4), 740-747. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318069014f

[15] Muzurova, L. V., & Rezugin, A. M. (2008). Correlation relations of linear cranio-cephalometric parameters in persons with orthognathic occlusion. Morphology, 2, 92.

[16] Orlovskiy, V. О., Shinkaruk-Dykovytska, М. М., & Gunas, I. V. (2018). Modeling using regression analysis of individual linear dimensions of premolars depending on cephalometric indicators of practically healthy men from different regions of Ukraine. Bulletin of scientific research, 1, 90-95. doi: 10.11603/2415-8798.2018.1.8737

[17] Pachеco-Pereira, C., Canto, G. D. L., Major, P. W., & Flores-Mir, C. (2014). Variation of orthodontic treatment decision-making based on dental model type: A systematic review. The Angle Orthodontist, 85(3), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.2319/051214-343.1

[18] Proffit, U. R. (translation from English; Ed. L. S. Persina) (2015). Modern orthodontics. М.: Medpress-inform. ISBN: 978-5-00030-236-1

[19] Rasulov, I. М. (2011). Odontological features of the structure of the central incisors of the upper jaw (anthropological aspects). Bulletin of the Dagestan Scientific Center. Makhachkala, 3, 45-47.

[20] Samusev, R. P., Krayushkin , А. I., & Dmitrienko, S. V. (Ed. М. R. Sapin) (2002). Basics of clinical morphology of teeth: a tutorial. М.: ООО “Publishing House “ONIX 21 vek”: ООО “World and Education”. ISBN: 5-329-00426-8

[21] Santoroa, M., Jarjourab, K., & Cangialosic, T. J. (2006). Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique. American J. оf Orthodontics add Dentofacial Orthopedics, 3, 345-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.010

[22] Scherbakova, L. V. (2004). Anthropometric parameters of cranio-facial complex of females and males 18-20 years old. The theses are presented in the materials of the conference dedicated to the 65th anniversary of the Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy of the Volgograd State Medical University. Volgograd, 60(3), 93-94.

[23] Slavicek, G. (2011). Cephalometrie. Berlin: Steinbeis-Ed. ISBN: 9783941417724

[24] Smerdina, L. N., & Smerdina, Yu. G. (2010). Biological norm of orthognathic occlusion (monograph). The successes of modern natural science, 2, 48-49.

[25] Swennen, G. R. J., Barth, E., Eulzer, C., & Schutyser, F. (2007). The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 36(2), 146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.019

[26] Swennen, G. R. J., Mommaerts, M. Y., Abeloos, J., De Clercq, C., Lamoral, P., Neyt, N., … Schutyser, F. (2009). A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 38(1), 48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.11.006

[27] Trezubov, V. N., Bulycheva, E. A., Chikunov, S. O., Trezubov, V. V., & Alpatyeva, U. V. (2015). The cephalometric study of the facial skeleton during the preparation to eliminating the occlusal surface deformations of dentition. Institute of Stomatology, 4(69), 102-104.

[28] Walker, F., Ayoub, A. F., Moos, K. F., & Barbenel, J. (2008). Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(7), 567-572. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.02.015

[29] Yadav, A. O., Walia, C. S., Borle, R. M., Chaoji, K. H., Rajan, R, Datarkar, A. N. (2011). Cephalometric norms for Central Indian population using Burstone and Legan analysis. Indian J. Dent. Res., 22(1), 28-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.79970

[30] Zubov, А. А. (1968). Odontology. Methodology of anthropological research. М.: Science.
Published
2018-03-29
How to Cite
KotsyuraО. (2018). REGRESSION MODELS OF INDIVIDUAL LINEAR SIZES OF MOLARS DEPENDING ON THE FEATURES OF CEPHALOMETRIC INDICES IN PRACTICALLY HEALTHY MEN OF THE WESTERN AND EASTERN REGIONS OF UKRAINE. Reports of Morphology, 24(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31393/morphology-journal-2018-24(1)-09