Features of cephalometric parameters, which usually do not change during surgery and orthodontic interventions, in Ukrainian young men and women with orthognathic occlusion and different types and profiles of the face according to Schwarz A.M.
Abstract
During the existence of the X-ray method of research, numerous author’s methods of cephalometric examination and analysis using the method of lateral teleroentgenography (methods by Schwarz, Down’s, Steiner, Tweed’s, Harvold, Ricketts, McNamara, Jaraback, Burstone, Bjork, etc.) have been developed. Dentists around the world prefer certain methods, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages. But there is still no single unified methodology for such research and doctors and researchers are constantly trying to improve them and gain new information about their effectiveness. The aim of the study was to establish cephalometric teleroentgenographic parameters and determine their features in Ukrainian young men and women with orthognathic occlusion depending on profiles and facial types according to Schwarz A.M. (hereinafter orthognathic occlusion), divided into separate groups of studies on different profiles and different face types according to Schwarz A.M. (3 groups of different profiles and 3 groups of different face types for people of each sex). Cephalometric teleroentgenographic parameters, which usually do not change during surgery and orthodontic interventions, were studied. Statistical mathematical processing of the research results was performed in the licensed package “Statistica 6.0” using non-parametric methods of evaluation of the obtained results. Numerical reliable and tendencies of differences in certain indicators between groups of young men or women with different profiles or face types have been established. The greatest differences, both in young men and women, were recorded between the indicators determined by the methods of cephalometry by Schwarz A.M. and Bjork A., and the least – by the method of Ricketts R.M. The obtained results testify to the expediency of using the division of young men and women into separate groups by profile and type of face to adhere to the personalized principle in the morphological assessment of cephalometric and gnatometric indicators of lateral teleroentgenography.
References
[2] Aghili, H., Tabatabaei, S. M., Moghadam, M. G., Jafarzadeh, M., & Samei, R. (2016). Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Iranian normal subjects. International Journal of medical Research & Health Sciences, 5(4), 149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2015.12.003
[3] Ahsan, A., Yamaki, M., Hossain, Z., & Saito, I. (2013). Craniofacial cephalometric analysis of Bangladeshi and Japanese adults with normal occlusion and balanced faces: A comparative study. Journal of Orthodontic Science, 2(1), 7. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.110327
[4] Alam, M. K., Qamruddin, I., Basri, R., Harun, K. M. A. L., Mat Arifin, M. N. A., & Kamarazaman, K. B. (2016). Cephalometric comparison of sagittal analyses between Malay and Malaysian Chinese: old and recent approaches. Int. Med. J., 23, 420-423.
[5] Alshammery, D. A., Almubarak, S., Hezaim, A. B., Alkhunein, R., Pani, S. C., & Mossadomi, H. (2016). Cephalometric norms of skeletal relationship among populations in selected Arab countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Journal of Oral Sciences, 3(2), 69-74. doi: 10.4103/1658-6816.188079
[6] Amini, F., Razavian, Z. S., & Rakhshan, V. (2016). Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces. International orthodontics, 14(1), 108-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2015.12.003
[7] Arnett, G. W., & Bergman, R. T. (1993). Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 103(4), 299-312. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70010-L
[8] Atit, M. B., Deshmukh, S. V., Rahalkar, J., Subramanian, V., Naik, C., & Darda, M. (2013). Mean values of Steiner, Tweed, Ricketts and McNamara analysis in Maratha ethnic population: A cephalometric study. APOS Trends in Orthodontics, 3(5), 137-151. doi: 10.4103/2321-1407.119095
[9] Bejdová, Š., Dupej, J., Krajíček, V., Velemínská, J., & Velemínský, P. (2018). Stability of upper face sexual dimorphism in central European populations (Czech Republic) during the modern age. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 132(1), 321-330. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1625-3
[10] Burstone, C. J., James, R. B., Legan, H., Murphy, G. A., & Norton, L. A. (1978). Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery (American Dental Association: 1965), 36(4), 269-277. PMID: 273073
[11] Calçada, D., Correia, A., & Araújo, F. (2014). Anthropometric analysis of anterior maxillary teeth with digital photography-a study in a Portuguese sample. Int. J. Esthet. Dent., 9(3), 370-380. PMID: 25126617
[12] Castillo, J. C., Gianneschi, G., Azer, D., Manosudprasit, A., Haghi, A., Bansal, N., ... & Masoud, M. I. (2019). The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements. The Angle Orthodontist, 89(2), 275-283. doi: 10.2319/120317-825.1
[13] Celebi, A. A., Keklik, H., Tan, E., & Ucar, F. I. (2016). Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 21(2), 51-58. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.2.051-058.oar.
[14] Chernysh, A. V., Gavryluk, A. O., Dmytrenko, S. V., Serebrennikova, O. A., & Balynska, M. V. (2018). Cephalometric studies of ukrainian boys and girls with orthognathic bite by the method of R.M. Ricketts. The World of Medicine and Biology, (2 (64)). 88-93. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-2-64-88-93
[15] Dmitriev, M. O. (2016). Determination of normative cephalometric parameters by the Steiner method for Ukrainian young men and women. World of Medicine and Biology, 12(3 (57)), 28-32.
[16] Dmitriev, M. O., Chernysh, A. V., & Chugu, T. V. (2018). Cephalometric studies of Ukrainian boys and girls with physiological bite by the method of Charles J. Burstone. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology, (30), 62-67. doi: 10.31393/bba30-2018-09
[17] Dmitriev, M. O., Chernysh, A. V., & Gunas, I. V. (2019). Features of the Cephalometric Profile of Ukrainian youth by Methods of Ricketts R.M., Burstone C. J. and Harvold E. P. World Science, 3(6 (46)), 4-10. doi: 10.31435/rsglobal_ws/30062019/6569
[18] Dmitriev, M. O., Chugu, T. V., Gerasimchuk, V. V., & Cherkasova, O. V. (2017). Determination of craniometric and gnatometric parameters according to the method of A.M. Schwartz for Ukrainian young men and women. Biomedical and Biosocial Anthropology, (29), 53-58.
[19] Doroshenko, S. I., & Kulginskii, E. A. (2007). Basics of teleroentgenography. К.: Zdorovia.
[20] Gunas, I. V., Dmitriev, М. О., Prokopenko, S. V., Shinkaruk-Dykovytska, М. М., & Yеroshenko, G. A. (2017). Determination regulatory cephalometric options by the method of tweed international foundation for ukrainian boys and girls. World of Medicine and Biology, 62(4), 27-31. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2017-4-62-27-31
[21] Gunas, І. V., Dmitriev, M. O., Tikholaz, V. O., Shinkaruk-Dykovytska, М.М., Pastukhova, V. A., Melnik, М. Р., & Rudiy, Y. I. (2018). Determination of normal cephalometric parameters by J. McNamara method for Ukrainian boys and girls. World of Medicine and Biology, 63(1), 19-22. doi: 10.26724/2079-8334-2018-1-63-19-22
[22] Hashim, H. A., & AlBarakati, S. F. (2003). Cephalometric soft tissue profile analysis between two different ethnic groups: a comparative study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract., 4(2), 60-73. doi: 10.5005/jcdp-4-2-60
[23] Jacobson, A., & White, L. (2007). Radiographic cephalometry: from basics to 3-D imaging. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 131(4), S133. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.038
[24] Phulari, B. (2013). An atlas on cephalometric landmarks. JP Medical Ltd. doi: 10.5005/jp/books/11877
[25] Ploder, O., Köhnke, R., Winsauer, H., Götz, C., Bissinger, O., Haller, B., & Kolk, A. (2019). Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible? Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 77(2), 135-141. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1515443
[26] Proffit, W. R., Fields Jr, H. W., & Sarver, D. M. (2006). Contemporary Orthodontics. Elsevier Health Sciences.
[27] Schwarz, A. M. (1961). Roentgenostatics: a practical evaluation of the x-ray headplate. American Journal of Orthodontics, 47(8), 561-585. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(61)90001-X
[28] Schwarz, A. M. (1960). Röntgenostatics; Practical Evaluation of the Tele-X-ray-photo (study-head-plate) (Vol. 1). Leo L. Bruder.
[29] Toroglu, M. S., Uzel, E., Kayalioglu, M., & Uzel, İ. (2002). Asymmetric maxillary expansion (AMEX) appliance for treatment of true unilateral posterior crossbite. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 122(2), 164-173. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.125563
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 
ISSN 
