Clinical and X-ray evaluation of long-term results of hip replacement and metalloosteosynthesis in elderly patients with pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric femoral fractures


  • A.M. Kayafa
  • O.M. Zhuk
  • S.L. Dudar
  • O.A. Okaievych
  • O.V. Botsul
Keywords: pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric fractures, treatment outcome, osteometallosynthesis, hip arthroplasty

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct the comparative statistical analysis of late surgical treatment outcomes of femoral fractures in trochanteric segment. It has been established that the total average mark under Harris Hip Score of control group patients after osteometallosynthesis with extra- and internal fixation devices is significantly lower (p<0,05) than patients from endoprosthesis replacement experiment group.

References

1. Ayhan, E., Kesmezacar, H. & Karaman Ö. (2013). Bipolar or unipolar hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture in the geriatric population. Balkan Medical Journal, 30(4), 400-405. doi:10.5152/balkanmedj.2013.8571.

2. Azizov, M. J. & Ruziboev, D. R. (2012). Clinical and functional results of total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics, Traumatology and Prosthetics, 1, 81–83. doi:10.15674/0030-59872012181-83.

3. Burianov, O. A. & Omelchenko, T. N. (2016). Prokarti forte in treatment of patients with early-stage osteoarthritis. Pain. Joints. Spine, 2(22), 21–27. doi:10.22141/2224-1507.2.22.2016.75757.

4. Celiktas, M., Togrul, E., & Kose, O. (2015). Calcar preservation arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 7(4), 436-442. doi:10.4055/cios.2015.7.4.436.

5. Huttunen, T., Kannus, P., Pihlajamäki, H. & Mattila, V. M. (2014). Pertrochanteric fracture of the femur in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register: validity of procedural coding, external cause for injury and diagnosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15 (98), 98–102. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-98.

6. O’Malley, N. T., Deeb, A., & Bingham, K. W. (2012). Outcome of the dynamic helical hip screw system for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly patients. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation, 3(2), 68–73. doi:10.1177/2151458512450707.

7. Radosavljevic, N., Nikolic, D., Lazovic, M., &, Jeremic, A. (2014). Hip fractures in a geriatric population - rehabilitation based on patients needs. Aging and Disease, 5(3), 177–182. doi:10.14336/AD.2014.0500177.

8. Tarrant, S. M., Hardy, B. M., Byth, P. L. & Brown, T. L. (2014). Preventable mortality in geriatric hip fracture inpatients. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96(9), 1178–1184. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B9.32814.

9. Timonina, M. B. (Ed.). (2016). The population of Ukraine for 2016. Demographic Yearbook. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://database.ukrcensus.gov.ua/PXWEB2007/ukr/publ_new1/2016/naselen_2015.pdf.

10. Zhou, Z., Tian, S., Zhang, X. & Wu, Y. (2012). Minimally invasive versus conventional dynamic hip screw for the treatment to intertrochanteric fractures in older patients. Orthopedics 35(2), 244–249. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120123-42.
Published
2017-10-27
How to Cite
Kayafa, A., Zhuk, O., Dudar, S., Okaievych, O., & Botsul, O. (2017). Clinical and X-ray evaluation of long-term results of hip replacement and metalloosteosynthesis in elderly patients with pertrochanteric and intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Reports of Morphology, 23(2), 266-269. Retrieved from https://morphology-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/62
Section
ANTROPOLOGICAL STUDIES